Abstract
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26333/sts.xxxviii2.07
This article develops the conjecture that inference from facts to normativity is a precondition for building a narrative account of a concerto movement as a dialogue between self-fashioning musical actors. This article searches for the exact mechanism for becoming normative. Normativity serves as an "ought" relationship between two thematic entries, thus initiating internal communication and dialogue and the allegory of a moral choice between the themes. This relationship is regulated by the 18th-century concept of self- and other-directed sympathy, and is formalised as eight transformation functions that serve as epistemic filters and appear in either a consecutive or simultaneous manner depending on the mechanism of representation. Throughout the article, the influence of fact-value-divide on analytical methodology is discussed. The conceptual tools that are used in constructing the framework are reflective equilibrium, sympathy, narrative high point and narrative coherence/unity. The existential semiotic Moi vs Soi distinction is proposed as a possible solution for inference from facts to values.
References
1. Aoun, J. (1985). A Grammar of Anaphora. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
2. Arendt, H. (1992). Lectures on Kant?s Political Philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
3. Brandom, R. (1994). Making it Explicit. Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4. Cone, E. (1974). The Composer?s Voice. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press.
5. Foucault, M. (1972). The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.
6. Gill, M. (2006). The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Goodman, N. (1983). Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Cambridge: HUP.
8. Greenblatt, S. (1980). Renaissance Self-Fashioning. From More to Shakespeare. The University of Chicago Press.
9. Greenblatt, S. (2001). Hamlet in Purgatory. Princeton: PUP.
10. Greimas, A. J., Courtes, J. (1982). Semiotics and Language: An Analytical Dictionary. Indiana University Press.
11. Heimonen, P. (2024). Is There a Role for Moral Choice in a Mozart Piano Concerto? Roczniki humanistyczne, 72(12), 175?188.
12. Heimonen, P. (2025). Music Analytical Model of the Skill of Emotional Contagion: Pride and Benevolence in Mozart?s Piano Concerto K. 466. In J. Ojala, M. Bauters, L. Díaz-Kommonen (Eds.), Feeling, Skill and Knowledge: Semiotics of the Subject in Environment, Culture and World (pp. 283?295). Springer.
13. Hepokoski, J., Darcy, W. (2006). Elements of Sonata Theory. Norms, Types, and Deformations in the Late-Eighteenth-Century Sonata. Oxford: OUP.
14. Hume, D. (2001). A Treatise of Human Nature. A Critical Edition. Volume 1: Texts. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15. Keefe, S. (2001). Mozart?s Piano Concertos. Dramatic Dialogue in the Age of Enlightenment. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.
16. Koch, H. (1983). Introductory Essay on Composition. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.
17. Lasonen-Aarnio, M. (2019). Guidance, Epistemic Filters, and Non-Accidental Ought-Doing. Philosophical Issues, 29(1), 172?183.
18. Putnam, H. (2002). The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy. Cambridge: HUP.
19. Rochberg, G. (1997). Polarity in Music: Symmetry and Asymmetry and Their Con?sequences. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 141(2), 169?176.
20. Railton, P. (2003). Facts, Values, and Norms. Essays Toward a Morality of Consequence. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
21. Saussure, F. (2013). Course in General Linguistics. Bloomsbury.
22. Smith, A. (2002). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Cambridge University Press.
23. Suikkanen, J., Kauppinen, A. (Eds.). (2019). Methodology and Moral Philosophy. New York; London: Routledge.
24. Tarasti, E. (2001). Existential Semiotics. Bloomington; Indianapolis: IUP.
25. Tarasti, E. (2012). Semiotics of Classical Music: How Mozart, Brahms and Wagner Talk to Us. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
26. Tarasti, E. (2015). Sein und Schein: Explorations in Existential Semiotics. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
27. von Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and Action. A Logical Enquiry. London: Rout?ledge & Kegan Paul.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Semiotic Studies

