Basic Concepts: A Cognitive Approach


theory of basic concepts
overall similarity
deictic-inductive definition



This article seeks to describe concepts of a special kind, these being ones that count as basic, while at the same time referring to the results of research in logic, the philosophy of language, and empirically pursued cognitive psychology. The key issue addressed is this: on what grounds are such basic concepts formed? It thus investigates issues pertaining to their formation and operation, especially in small children. (Basiclevel concepts will be examples of basic concepts.) Such concepts can take the form of mental representations of objects, properties and relations. They function in classifications made by numerous and diverse cultural groups, are established at an early stage—being the first to be named and, so to speak, malleable—and their structure is not satisfactorily captured by any currently recognized theory. Moreover, they are organized around some sort of overall similarity irreducible to any particular component part. (Basic concepts pertaining to properties and relations must be based on some overall similarity, as properties and relations themselves do not consist of parts. Equally, basic concepts pertaining to objects cannot be constructed on the basis of mere parts of these objects.) Psychologists and philosophers, on the other hand, frequently claim that properties are component parts to which overall similarity can be reduced (e.g. in exemplar-based and prototype-based theories of concepts). Yet if this solution were to be accepted, one would then have to say that three- or four-month-old children are unable to establish properties before delimiting the range of the relevant category (or any fragment of this range), whilst also being unable to establish the range of that category (or any fragment of it) before delimiting its properties. The problem with this is that children can distinguish some properties; however, they are incapable of establishing within a relatively short period of time which of these properties determine membership in the sense of falling within the range of the category in question. Moreover, basic concepts cannot be organized on the basis of a relation of similarity reducible to properties, due to the fact that any such similarity will be an equivalence relation, whilst the similarity relation accessible to the child constitutes a nonequivalence relation. A further point is that no consensus has yet been agreed upon within the psychological literature as to the construction of concepts formed by three- or fourmonth-old children.



Ajdukiewicz, K. (1975). Logika pragmatyczna. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Arterberry, M. E., Bornstein, M. H. (2001). Three-Month-Old Infants’ Categorization of Animals and Vehicles Based on Static and Dynamic Attributes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80(4), 333−346.

Behl-Chadha, G. (1996). Basic-Level and Superordinate-Like Categorical Representations in Early Infancy. Cognition, 60(2), 105−141.

Berlin, B. (1978). Ethnobiological Classification. In: E. Rosch, B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 9−26). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Berlin, B. (1994). Evidence for Pervasive Synesthetic Symbolism in Ethnozoological Nomenclature. In: L. Hinton, J. Nichols, J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound Symbolism (pp. 76−93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Berlin, B., Kay, P. (1969). Basic Colour Terms. Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Bloom, L. (1993). The Transition from Infancy to Language. Acquiring the Power of Expression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bornstein, M. H., Kessen, W., Weiskopf, S. (1976). Color Vision and Hue Categorization in Young Human Infants. Journal Experimental: Human, Perception, Performance, 2(1), 115−129.

Bornstein, M. H., Kessen, W., Weiskopf, S. (1976). The Categories of Hue in Infancy. Science, 191(4223), 201−202.

Brockman, J. (Ed.). (1995). The Third Culture. New York: Touchstone.

Brooks, L. (1978). Nonanalytic Concept Formation and Memory for Instances. In: E. Rosch, B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 169−211). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Browicz, K. (1993a). Dąb. In: A. Szweykowska, J. Szweykowski (Eds.), Słownik botaniczny (pp. 118−119). Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.

Browicz, K. (1993b). Klon. In: A. Szweykowska, J. Szweykowski (Eds.), Słownik botaniczny (pp. 264−267). Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.

Browicz, K. (1993c). Modrzew. In: A. Szweykowska, J. Szweykowski (Eds.), Słownik botaniczny (p. 386). Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.

Carey, S. (2009). The Origin of Concepts. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Clark, E. V. (2003). First Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eimas, P. D., Quinn, P. C. (1994). Studies on the Formation of Perceptually-Based Basic-Level Categories in Young Infants. Child Development, 65(3), 903−917.

Eldredge, N. (1995). A Battle of Words. In: Brockman J. (Ed.), The Third Culture (pp. 119−128). New York: Touchstone.

Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J.S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in Early Communicative Development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(5), 1–173.

Franklin, A., Davies, I. R. L. (2004). New Evidence for Infant Colour Categories. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22(3), 349−377.

Gentner, D., Namy, L. L. (2004). The Role of Comparison in Children’s Early Word Learning. In: D. G. Hall, S. R. Waxman (Eds.), Weaving a Lexicon (pp. 533−568). Cambridge, Massachusetts−London: The MIT Press.

Hall, D. G., Waxman, S. R. (Eds.). (2004). Weaving a Lexicon. Cambridge, Massachusetts−London: The MIT Press.

Hinton, L., Nichols, J., Ohala, J. J. (Eds.). (1994). Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Hennon, E. A., Maguire, M. J. (2004). Hybrid Theories at the Frontier of Developmental Psychology: The Emergentist Coalition Model of Word Learning as a Case in Point. In: D. G. Hall, S. R. Waxman (Eds.), Weaving a Lexicon (pp. 173−204). Cambridge, Massachusetts−London: The MIT Press.

Koj, L. (1969). On Defining Meaning Families. Studia Logica, 25, 78−87.

Koj, L. (2007). O początkach teorii zbiorów. Studia Semiotyczne, 26, 59−80.

Koj, L. (1988). Schematy definicyjne dla rodzin znaczeniowych. In: Z. Muszyński (Ed.), O nieostrości (pp. 303─317). Lublin: Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.

Kotarbińska, J. (1959). Tak zwana definicja deiktyczna. In: Kotarbiński T., Kotarbińska J. (Eds.), Fragmenty Filozoficzne. Seria druga. Księga pamiątkowa ku uczczeniu czterdziestolecia pracy nauczycielskiej w Uniwersytecie Warszawskim profesora Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego (pp. 44−74). Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago−London: The University of Chicago Press.

Landau, B. (2004). Perceptual Units and Their Mapping with Language. How Children Can (Or Can’t?) Use Perception to Learn Words. In: D. G. Hall, S. R. Waxman (Eds.), Weaving a Lexicon (pp. 111−148). Cambridge, Massachusetts−London: The MIT Press.

Machery, E. (2009). Doing Without Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Murphy, G. L. (2004). The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, Massachusetts−London: The MIT Press.

Palmer, S. E. (2002). Perceptual Grouping: It’s Later Than You Think. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(3), 101−106.

Putnam, H. (1996). The Meaning of “Meaning”. In: A. Pessin, S. Goldberg (Eds.), The Twin Earth Chronicles. Twenty Years of Reflection on Hilary Putnam’s “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’” (pp. 3−52). Armonk, New York−London: M. E. Sharpe.

Putnam, H. (1998). Wiele twarzy realizmu i inne eseje. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Quinn, P. C. (1994). The Categorization of Above and Below Spatial Relations by Young Infants. Child Development, 65(1), 58−69.

Quinn, P. C., Eimas P. D. (1996). Perceptual Cues That Permit Categorical Differentiation of Animal Species by Infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63(1), 189−211.

Rosch, E. (1977). Human Categorization. In: N. Warren (Ed.) Advances in Cross-Cultural Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1−49). London: Academic Press.

Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of Categorization. In: E. Rosch, B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 27−48). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Rosch, E., Lloyd, B. B. (Eds.). (1978). Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Stern, W. (1959). The Background of Linnaeus’ Contributions to the Nomenclature and Methods of Systematic Biology. Systematic Zoology, 8(1), 4−22.

Szweykowska, A., Szweykowski, J. (Eds.). (1993). Słownik botaniczny. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.

Tversky, A. (1977). Features of Similarity. Psychological Reviev, 84(4), 327−352.

Tversky, A., Gati, I. (1982). Similarity, Separability, and the Triangle Inequality. Psychological Review, 89(2), 123−154.

Voitsekhovskii, M. I. (1995). Set. In: M. Hazewinkel (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Mathematics (Vol. 5, pp. 120−121). Dordrecht−Boston−London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Walentukiewicz, W. (2011). Definicje deiktyczne a pojęcia. Badania z pogranicza filozofii języka i psychologii kognitywnej. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.

Wertheimer, M. (1923). Unterschungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II. Psychologische Forschung, 4(1), 301−350.

Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Język - umysł - kultura. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Wittgenstein, L. (1997). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.