The Hidden Meaning of the Feast: Representations of Gender, Class and Ethnic Oppression in a Performance of the Brazilian Guerreiro
PDF

Keywords

ethnomusicology
semiotics
musical analysis
cultural heritage
syncretism

Abstract

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26333/sts.xxxviii2.05

The objective of this paper is to discuss the representations of class, gender and ethnic oppression crystalized in an excerpt of a 2019 presentation of Master Cosmo?s Guerreiro in Juazeiro do Norte, Brazil. The Guerreiro, a traditional Brazilian folkloric manifestation associated with the Christmas cycle, encompasses an Epiphany celebration characterized by a series of tunes performed by dancing, singing and/or playing?and sometimes also by acting?yielding a complex, rhapsodic syncretic text. The methodological framework for this analysis is grounded in Eero Tarasti?s Existential Semiotics, utilizing its Zemic model to facilitate a nuanced approach to understanding the construction of meaning in the syncretic performative text?from its corporeality to identity, then to social interactions, and ultimately revealing its values and Weltanschauung. By applying the semiotic perspective developed by Stuart Hall, this analysis reveals the dynamics of oppression within the discourse. This critical viewpoint is further enriched by the concept of Intersectionality as discussed by Kimberlé Crenshaw, which underscores the presence in the discourse of the imprints of the social, cultural, and political context from which enunciation takes place, highlighting its position within unequal power structures. Among the most remarkable results discussed in this paper appear the intersectionality of gender, class, and ethnic oppression in the depiction of black women in the Guerreiro, alongside the identification of the primary semi-symbolic rhetorical strategies deployed to construct this representation in the syncretic text.

PDF

References

1. Albernaz, L. S. F. (2019). Gender and Musical Performance in Maracatus (PE) and Bumba Bois (MA). Revista Vórtex, 7(3), 1?28.

2. Albernaz, L. S. F., Lima, P. G. B. (2021). G?nero e cultura popular: Relaç?es de poder e identidades nas práticas musicais do bumba-meu-boi do Maranh?o [Gender and Folk Culture: Power Relations and Identities in the Mu?sical Practices of the Bumba-Meu-Boi in Maranh?o]. Revista Mundaú, 1(1), 135?156.

3. Barros, D. L. P. de. (1988). Teoria do discurso: Fundamentos semióticos [Theory of Discourse: Semiotic Foundations]. S?o Paulo: Atual.

4. Barros, D. L. P. de. (1990). Teoria semiótica do texto [Semiotic Theory of the Text]. S?o Paulo: Ática.

5. Barroso, O. (1996). Reis de Congo: teatro popular tradicional [Reis de Congo: Traditional Popular Theater]. Fortaleza: Ministério da Cultura; Museu da Imagem e do Som.

6. Bier, C. (2025). Symmetry-Breaking in Oriental Carpets: The Case for Beauty. Washington, DC: The Textile Museum. Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/textileresearch/33

7. Brand?o, T. (2003). Folguedos natalinos [Christmas Folk Festivities]. Maceió: Universidade Federal de Alagoas; Museu Théo Brand?o.

8. Carrico, A. (2012). O mamulengo em cena no contexto contemporâneo [The Mamulengo Puppet Theatre Onstage in the Contemporary Context]. Revista de Estudos em Artes C?nicas, 3(1), 1?14.

9. Cascudo, L. da C. (1988). Dicionário do folclore brasileiro [Dictionary of Brazilian Folklore]. Belo Horizonte: Itatiaia; S?o Paulo: Ediouro.

10. Conceiç?o, M. M. da (2004). Mestra Margarida Guerreira [Master Margarida, The Warrior]. Mestres da Cultura. https://www.mestresdacultura.com.br/mestre-margarida-guerreira

11. Conceiç?o, M. M. da. (2024). Mestra Margarida. Carroça de Mamulengos. https://www.carrocademamulengos.com.br/mestra-margarida

12. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139?167.

13. Cruz, A., Motta, G., Silva, L., Vellinho, M., Beltrame, V. N. (Eds.). (2021, June). Revista Mamulengo N? 18. A presença negra no Teatro de Animaç?o brasileiro [Black Presence in Brazilian Puppet Theatre]. Florianópolis: Associaç?o Brasileira de Teatro de Bonecos?Centro UNIMA Brasil (ABTB-CUB).

14. Fiorin, J. L. (1994). Polifonia textual e discursiva [Textual and Discursive Poliphony]. In D. L. P. de Barros, J. L. Fiorin (Eds.), Dialogismo, polifonia, intertextualidade: em torno de Bakhtin (pp. 29?36). S?o Paulo: EDUSP.

15. Floch, J.-M. (1995). Identités visuelles [Visual Identities]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

16. Greimas, A. J., Courtés, J. (1986). Sémiotique: dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage [Vol. 2; Semiotics and Language: An Analytical Diction?ary]. Paris: Hachette.

17. Greimas, A. J., Fontanille, J. (1993). Semiótica das paix?es [The Semiotics of Passions]. S?o Paulo: Ática.

18. Hall, S. (2016). Cultura e representaç?o [Representation: Cultural Represent?a?tions and Signifying Practices]. Rio de Janeiro: Apicuri.

19. Heidegger, M. (1955). Vom Wesen des Grundes [The Essence of Ground]. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

20. Heidegger, M. (1967). Sein und Zeit [11th Edition; Being and Time]. Max Niemeyer Verlag.

21. Howes, D. (2005). Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. Oxford: Berg.

22. Hugo, V. (1876). Cromwell. Paris: Alphonse Lemerre.

23. Kant, I. (1913). Kritik der reinen Vernunft [Critique of Pure Reason]. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.

24. Lima Irm?o, J. B. (2015). Lampi?o, a raposa das caatingas [3rd Edition; Lampi?o, the Fox of the Hinterlands]. Salvador: JM Gráfica e Editora.

25. Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.

26. Kress, G., van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.

27. Kress, G., Bezemer, J. (2016). Multimodality, Learning and Communication: A So?cial Semiotic Frame. London: Routledge.

28. Lotman, Y. M. (1990). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London: I.B. Tauris.

29. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception [Phenomenology of Perception]. Paris: Gallimard.

30. Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Opprobrium. In Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Re?trieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/opprobrium

31. Mira, M. C., Cerqueira, V. L. C. (2019). Os intelectuais e a ?cultura popular? em S?o Paulo: Do folclore ?s políticas culturais [The Intellectuals and ?Popular Culture? in S?o Paulo: From Folklore to Cultural Policies]. Revista Pós Ci?ncias Sociais, 15(31), 89?105. https://doi.org/10.18764/2236-9473.v15n31p89-105

32. Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London: Routledge.

33. Núcleo de Pesquisa. (2024, August 18). Oh Doida?peça do Guerreiro de Nossa Senhora Aparecida [?Oh Madwoman? ? a Piece From the Guerreiro of Our Lady of Aparecida; Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08OE6Epgxjw

34. Nunes, K. et al. (2025) Admixture?s Impact on Brazilian Population Evolution and Health. Science, 388(6748). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adl3564

35. Ramos, A. (1935). O folclore negro no Brasil [Black Folklore in Brazil]. Rio de Janeiro: Livraria-Editora da Casa do Estudante do Brasil.

36. Rocha, J. M. T. (1984). Folguedos e Danças de Alagoas: sistematizaç?o & clas?sificaç?o [Folk Performances and Dances of Alagoas: Systematization and Classification]. Maceió: Secretaria de Educaç?o e Cultura de Alagoas; Comiss?o Alagoana de Folclore.

37. Shusterman, R. (2000). Pragmatist Aesthetics: Living Beauty, Rethinking Art. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

38. Silva, V. G. da (2005). Candomblé e Umbanda: caminhos da devoç?o brasileira [5th Edition; Candomblé and Umbanda: Pathways of Brazilian Devotion]. S?o Paulo: Selo Negro.

39. Sovik, L. (2002). O Haiti é aqui / O Haiti n?o é aqui: Música Popular, Depend?ncia Cultural e Identidade Brasileira na Pol?mica Schwarz-Silviano Santiago. Estudios y otras prácticas intelectuales latinoamericanas en cultura y poder [Haiti Is Here / Haiti Is Not Here: Popular Music, Cultural Dependency, and Brazilian Identity in the Schwarz?Silviano Debate]. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

40. Tarasti, E. (2015). Sein und Schein: Explorations in Existential Semiotics. Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter Inc.

41. Tatit, L. (1998). Musicando a semiótica [Musicalizing Semiotics]. S?o Paulo: Annablume.

42. Uchôa, N. (2025, August 29). Photograph of Mestra Margarida Wearing a Church-Shaped Guerreiro Hat [Photograph]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/DG6dqs9PTu3/?img_index=3

43. Vogler, Ch. (2007). The Writer?s Journey: Mythic Structure for Writers. Studio City: Michael Wiese Productions.

44. García Yebra, V. (2022). Poética de Aristóteles: Edición trilingüe [Aristotle?s Poetics: Trilingual Edition]. RBA?Gredos.

45. Zumthor, P. (1983). La lettre et la voix: de la ?littérature? médiévale [The Letter and the Voice: On the ?Literature? of the Middle Ages]. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.