Review of Paweł Grabarczyk’s "Directival Theory of Meaning: From Syntax and Pragmatics to Narrow Linguistic Content"

Abstract

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26333/sts.xxxv1.07

This paper is a review of Paweł Grabarczyk’s latest book, Directival Theory of Meaning: From Syntax and Pragmatics to Narrow Linguistic Content. I focus mostly on two concepts constitutive for the directival theory of meaning—that of linguistic trial and that of meaning directive. These two concepts, while ingeniously developed by Grabarczyk, are not free of problems and somewhat controversial assumptions. I start with describing the basis of Grabarczyk’s proposal, as well as of the historical background from which it originated. Then, I move on to the analysis of the notion of linguistic trial. After that I focus on the concept of meaning directive, criticising certain assumptions that come with it. The conclusion is that while Grabarczyk’s version of the directival theory of meaning is an interesting proposal, most of its shortcomings stem from the fact that for a theory that is supposed to work well on natural languages, too many examples pertain to artificial languages. Until an analysis of a natural language in the style of the directival theory of meaning is conducted, it is not possible to properly judge the value of this theory.

PDF

References

Ajdukiewicz, K. (1931). On the Meaning of Expressions. In J. Giedymin (Ed.), The Scientific World-Perspective and Other Essays, 1931–1963 (pp. 1–34), Dordrecht: Springer.

Block, N. (1993). Holism, Hyper-Analyticity and Hyper-Compositionality. Mind and Language, 8(1), 1–26.

Fodor, J. A., Lepore, E. (1991). Why Meaning (Probably) Isn’t Conceptual Role. Philosophical Issues, 3, 15–35.

Fodor, J. A., Lepore, E. (1992). Holism: A Shopper’s Guide. Oxford: Blackwell.

Grabarczyk, P. (2019). Directival Theory of Meaning: From Syntax and Pragmatics to Narrow Linguistic Content. Cham: Springer.

McCullagh, M. (2003). Do Inferential Roles Compose? Dialectica, 57(4), 431–38.

Pagin, P. (1997). Is Compositionality Compatible With Holism? Mind & Language, 12(1), 11–33.

Plunkett, D. (2015). Which Concepts Should We Use? Metalinguistic Negotiations and the Methodology of Philosophy. Inquiry, 58(7–8), 828–874.

Quine, W. V. (1953). The Problem of Meaning in Linguistics. In From a Logical Point of View (pp. 47–64). Harvard: Harvard University Press.