Abstract
DOI: http://doi.org/10.26333/sts.xxxi2.10
The history of so-called ‘linguistic relativity’ is an odd and multifaceted one. After knowing alternate fortunes and being treated by different academic branches, today there are some new ways of investigating the language-thought-reality problem that (i) put into dialogue the latest trends in language-related disciplines (ii) generate room for philosophical themes previously overlooked, (iii) reassess the very idea of linguistic relativity, despite its popularized versions which have circulated for decades and which have led an otherwise fruitful debate to extremes. It is argued that a multidisciplinary approach is desirable in order to broaden future research. In the last few years the opportunity to study this matter following a common trend in several disciplines has been created. Language, and cognition too, are now conceived as intrinsically social phenomena. It is argued that relativistic effects should be investigated in social realms, and that analytic philosophy could help with this task.
References
Amoretti M. C., (2013). L’esternalismo del contenuto. Aphex. Portale italiano di filosofia analitica, 7, 247–279.
Austin, J. L., (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bach, E. (1986). Natural Language Metaphysics. In Marcus, R. Barcan, G. J. W. Dorn, P. Weingartner (Eds.) Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, VII (pp. 573–595). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Bach, E., Chao, W. (2012). The Metaphysics of Natural Language(s). In R. M. Kempson, T. Fernando, N. Asher (Eds.), Philosophy of Linguistics, 14 (pp. 175– 196). Amsterdam: North Holland, Elsevier.
Beckermann, A. (2004). Einleitung. In P. Prechtl (Ed.), Grundbegriffe der analytischen Philosophie (pp. 1–12). Stuttgart: Metzler.
Berlin B., Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Björk, I. (2008). Relativizing Linguistic Relativity: Investigating Underlying Assumptions about Language in the Neo-Whorfian Literature. Studia Linguistica Upsaliensia 6. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Bloom, P., Keil, F. C. (2001). Thinking Through Language. Mind & Language, 16, 351–367.
Borghi, A. M., Scorolli, C., Caligiore, D., Baldassarre, G., Tummolini, L. (2013). The Embodied Mind Extended: Using Words as Social Tools. Frontiers in Psychology, 4.
Boroditsky, L. (2001). “Does Language Shape Thought? English and Mandarin Speakers’ Conceptions of Time”. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22.
Burge, T. (1979). Individualism and the Mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 4, 73–122.
Casasanto, D. (2008). Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic Differences in Temporal Language and Thought. Language Learning, 58(suppl. 1), 63–79.
Casasanto, D. (2016). Linguistic Relativity. In N. Riemer (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Semantics (pp. 158–174). New York: Routledge.
Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, Mass. – London: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Clark, A. (1998). Magic Words: How Language Augments Human Computation. In P. Carruthers, J. Boucher (Eds.), Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes (pp. 162–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, A. (2003) Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies and the Future of Human Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A., Chalmers, D. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. Davidson, D. (1984). On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme. In Inquire into Truth and Interpretation (pp. 183–198). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. (1989). The Myth of the Subjective. In M. Krausz (Ed.), Relativism: Interpretations and Confrontations (pp. 159–172). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
De Caro, M., (2011). The Short Happy Life of the Swampman: Davidson and Social Externalism. In Amoretti, C., Preyer, G. (Eds.), Triangulation: From an Epistemological Point of View (pp. 179–196). Frankfurt: Ontos.
Dennett, D. C., (1993). Learning and Labelling. Mind and Language, 8(4), 540– 547.
Di Francesco, M., Piredda F. (2012). La mente estesa. Milan: Mondadori Università.
Diodato, F. (2015). Teorie della categorizzazione. Naples: Liguori.
Dor, D. (2015). The Instruction of Imagination. Language as a Social Communication Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Enfield, N. J. (2010). Human Sociality at the Heart of Language, prolusion. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.
Enfield, N. J. (2015). Linguistic Relativity from Reference to Agency. Annual Re view of Anthropology, 44(1), 207–224.
Goddard, C., Wierzbicka, A. (1995). Key Worlds, Culture and Cognition. Philosophica, 55, 37–77.
Gumperz. J. J., Levinson, S. C. (Eds.) (1996). Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heersmink, R. (2013). A Taxonomy of Cognitive Artefacts: Function, Information, and Categories. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(3), 465–481.
Heersmink, R. (2016). The Metaphysics of Cognitive Artefacts. Philosophical Explorations, 19(1), 78–93.
Humboldt, W. v. (1904). Essai sur les langues du Nouveau Continent. Gesammelte Schriften, III, 300–341.
Humboldt, W. v. (1988). On Language: The Diversity of Human Language-Structure and Its Influence on the Mental Development of Mankind. P. Heath (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Imai, M., Mazuka, R. (2003). Re-evaluation of Linguistic Relativity: Language--Specific Categories and the Role of Universal Ontological Knowledge in the Construal of Individuation. In D. Gentner, S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Issues of Language and Thought (pp. 430–464). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Koerner, E. F. K. (2000). Towards a ‘Full Pedigree’ of the ‘Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis’. From Locke to Lucy. In M. Pütz, M. Verspoor (Eds.), Explorations in Linguistic Relativity (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lee, P. (1996). The Whorf Theory Complex: A Critical Reconstruction. Amsterdam–New York: John Benjamins.
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lucy, J. A. (1992a). Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lucy, J. A. (1992b). Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lupyan, G. (2012). What Do Words Do? Toward a Theory of Language-Augmented Thought. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 57, 255–297.
Lupyan, G. (2016). The Centrality of Language in Human Cognition. Language Learning, 66(3), 516–553.
Lupyan, G., Clark, A. (2015). Words and the World Predictive Coding and the Language- Perception-Cognition Interface. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 279–284.
Marconi, D. (2014). Il mestiere di pensare. Torino: Einaudi.
Michael, L. (2002) Reformulating the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis: Discourse, Interaction, and Distributed Cognition. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Symposium about Language and Society – Austin. Citeseer.
Mirolli, M., Parisi, D. (2009). Language as a Cognitive Tool. Minds and Machines, 19(4), 517–528.
Norman, D. (1993). Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. New York: Basic Books.
Pavan S., Sgaravatti D., (2015). Willard Van Orman Quine. Aphex. Portale italiano di filosofia analitica, nr. 11.
Pelletier, F. J. (2010). Descriptive Metaphysics, Natural Language Metaphysics, Sapir-Whorf, and All That Stuff: Evidence From the Mass-Count Distinction. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 6(1), 1–46.
Penn, J. (1972). Linguistic Relativity versus Innate Ideas: The Origins of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis in German Thought. Paris: Mouton.
Pharao Hansen, M. (2009). A Critique of the Treatment of Linguistic Relativity in Steven Pinker’s ‘The Stuff of Thought’. Accessed December 6, 2017, https://www.academia.edu/1610936/A_critique_of_the_treatment_of_Linguistic_Relativity_in_Steven_Pinkers_The_Stuff_of_Thought
Pietarinen, A. (2009). Significs and the Origins of Analytic Philosophy. Journal of the History of Ideas, 70(3), 467–490.
Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct. New York, NY: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
Pinker, S. (2007). The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window Into Human Nature. New York, NY: Viking.
Putnam, H. (1975). The Meaning of ‘Meaning’. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 7, 131–193.
Quine, W. V. O. (1990). Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (2003) [1953]. From a Logical Point of View: 9 Logico-Philosophical Essays. Second Edition Revised. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Rosch, E. (1972) Universals in Color Naming and Memory. Journal of experimental Psychology, 93, 10–20.
Rossi, G., Zinken J. (2017). Social Agency and Grammar. In N. J. Enfield, P. Kockelman (Eds.), Distributed Agency (pp. 79–86). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (2007). Social Ontology and the Philosophy of Society. E. Margolis, S. Laurence (Eds.), Creations of the Mind. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Sidnell, J. (2017). Distributed Agency and Action under the Radar of Accountability. In N. J. Enfield, P. Kockelman (Eds.), Distributed Agency (pp. 87-86). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sidnell, J., Enfield, N. J. (2012). Language Diversity and Social Action: A Third Locus of Linguistic Relativity. Current Anthropology, 53(3), 302–333.
Simons, P. (2013). Metaphysics in Analytic Philosophy. In Michael Beaney, The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy (pp. 709–728). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “Thought and Language” to “Thinking for Speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz, S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steffensen, S. V. (2009). Language, Languaging, and the Extended Mind Hypothesis. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 677–697.
Tartabini, A. (2011). Aspetti evolutivi della comunicazione animale ed umana. In N. Grandi (Ed.), Dialoghi sulle lingue e sul linguaggio (pp. 127–134). Bologna: Pàtron Editore.
Wittgenstein, L. (2005). The Big Typescript, Ts. 213. Hoboken: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations. 4th edition, transl. P. M. S. Hacker and J. Schulte. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Whorf, B. L. (2012). Language, Thought, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wolff P., Holmes K. J., (2011). Linguistic Relativity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Review of Cognition, Sci., 2(3), 253–265.
Zinken, J. (2008). The Metaphor of ‘Linguistic Relativity’. History & Philosophy ofPsychology, 10(2), 1–10.