In my paper, I propose a certain classification of evaluative expressions. I hypothesize that the basic criterion to distinguish between evaluative and descriptive terms is the faultless disagreement test. Next, I discuss a few kinds of phenomena which seem to render this distinction dubious: context–sensitivity, vagueness and using descriptive terms to express evaluative judgments. Further, I investigate Ch. Kennedy’s proposal (2016) according to which gradable adjectives can express two kinds of subjectivity (one being generated by vagueness and one stemming from evaluativity). I modify this account by postulating another sub-class of subjective adjectives (“experiential adjectives”) which are not subjective due to vagueness and which are not evaluative either as they do not necessarily encode any valence. I propose a linguistic test to identify these expressions. Finally, I check where my classification of adjectives places the predicate of personal taste “tasty”. I suggest that “tasty” is both evaluative and experiential and additionally, it carries a condition of its own use, that is the information that can be used to positively assess the taste of something. This, I argue, makes it similar to thin evaluative terms as it carries no descriptive component at all.
Barker, C. (2013) Negotiating Taste, „Inquiry”, 56:2-3, s. 240-257.
Barker, C. (2002) The Dynamics of Vagueness, „Linguistics and Philosophy”, 25.1, s. 1-36.
Cepollaro, B., Stojanovic, I. (2016) Hybrid Evaluatives: In Defense of a Presuppositional Account, „Grazer Philosophische Studien” 93, s. 458-488.
Graff-Fara, D. (2000) Shifting Sands: An Interest-Relative Theory of Vagueness, „Philosophical Topics”, 28(1), s. 45–81.
Grice, P. (1989) Studies in the Ways of Words, Oxford University Press.
Hom, C. (2008) The Semantics of Racial Epithets, „Journal of Philosophy:” 105, s. 416-440.
Karczewska, N. (2016) Disagreement about the Taste as Disagreement about the Discourse: Problems and Limitations, „Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric”, 46 (59) 2016. S. 103-117.
Kennedy, C. (2007) Vagueness and Grammar: The Semantics of Relative and Absolute Gradable Adjectives, „Linguistics and Philosophy” 30 (1), s. 1-45.
Kennedy, C. (2016) Two Kinds of Subjectivity, w: Meier, C., van Wijnbergen-Huitink, J. Subjective Meaning – Alternatives to Relativism, Linguistische Arbeiten, De Gruyter, s. 105-126.
Kölbel, M. (2003) Faultless Disagreement, „Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society”, 104, s. 53–73.
Lasersohn, P. (2005) Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste, „Linguistics and Philosophy” 28, s. 643–68.
Lopez de Sa, D. (2015) Expressing Disagreement, „Erkenntnis” 80, s. 153–165.
Marques, T. (2016) Aesthetic Predicates: A Hybrid-Dispositional Account, „Inquiry” 56 (6), s. 723-751.
McNally, L., Stojanovic, I. (2014) Aesthetic Adjectives, w: Young, J. (red.) The Semantics of Aesthetic Judgments, Oxford University Press.
Odrowąż-Sypniewska, J. (2016) Faultless disagreement, predicates of personal taste and vagueness, w: Stalmaszczyk, P. (red.) Philosophical and Linguistic Analyses of Reference, wyd. Peter Lang.
Richard, M. (2004) Contextualism and relativism, „Philosophical Studies” 119, s. 215-242.
Sæbø, J. (2009) Judgment ascriptions, „Linguistics and Philosophy” 32 (4), s. 327–352.
Väyrynen, P. (2016) http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thick-ethical-concepts/, dostęp: 20.11.2016.
Wright, C. (1997) Truth and Objectivity, Oxford University Press.