Łukasiewicz and Quine on Empirical and A Priori Sciences

Abstract

DOI: http://doi.org/10.26333/sts.xxxiii2.07

Although Łukasiewicz and Quine do not share many common views, they agreed on one important point in the 1950s: they both denied the distinction between empirical and a priori sciences. This agreement might be surprising as this denial was rather controversial at that time. This paper focuses on Quine’s and Łukasiewicz’s denials of the distinction between empirical and a priori sciences, and proposes three possible answers to the question of why both formulated the same conclusion at a similar time. Firstly, it discusses Quine’s possible influence on Łukasiewicz as Łukasiewicz agreed with Quine’s criticism of modality at that time. Secondly, it considers the possibility that Quine was affected by Łukasiewicz via his debates with Łukasiewicz’s student, Tarski. Lastly, it takes into account the possibility that both philosophers were inspired by an external source, namely the rise of quantum mechanics.

PDF

References

Ciecierski, T., Wilkin, P. (2008). Dlaczego logik modalny nie musi przejmować się argumentem Quine’a? Przeglad Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria, 68(4), 303–318.

Creath, R. (1990). Dear Carnap, Dear Van. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Frost-Arnold, G. (2011). Quine’s Evolution from ‘Carnap’s Disciple’ to the Author of ‘Two Dogmas’. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 291–316.

Isaac, J. (2005). W. V. Quine and the Origins of Analytic Philosophy in the United States. Modern Intellectual History, 2(2), 205–234.

Łukasiewicz, J. (1957). Aristotle’s Syllogistic: From the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Łukasiewicz, J. (1970a). Farewell Lecture by Professor Jan Łukasiewicz, Delivered in the Warsaw University Lecture Hall on March 7, 1918. In: L. Borkowski (Ed.), Selected Works (pp. 84–86). Amsterdam, Warsaw: North-Holland Publishing Company – Polish Scientific Publisher.

Łukasiewicz, J. (1970b). On Determinism. In: L. Borkowski (Ed.), Selected Works (pp. 110–128). Amsterdam, Warsaw: North-Holland Publishing Company – Polish Scientific Publisher.

Łukasiewicz, J. (1970c). Logistic and Philosophy. In: L. Borkowski (Ed.), Selected Works (pp. 218–235). Amsterdam, Warsaw: North-Holland Publishing Company – Polish Scientific Publisher.

Łukasiewicz, J. (1970d). In Defense of Logistic. In: L. Borkowski (Ed.), Selected Works (pp. 236–249). Amsterdam, Warsaw: North-Holland Publishing Company – Polish Scientific Publisher.

Łukasiewicz, J. (1970e). On Variable Functors of Propositional Arguments. In: L. Borkowski (Ed.), Selected Works (pp. 311–324). Amsterdam, Warsaw: North-Holland Publishing Company – Polish Scientific Publisher.

Łukasiewicz, J. (1970f). A System of Modal Logic. In: L. Borkowski (Ed.), Selected Works (pp. 352–390). Amsterdam, Warsaw: North-Holland Publishing Company – Polish Scientific Publisher.

Łukasiewicz, J. (1970g). Arithmetic and Modal Logic. In: L. Borkowski (Ed.), Selected Works (pp. 391–400). Amsterdam, Warsaw: North-Holland Publishing Company – Polish Scientific Publisher.

Mancosu, P. (2005). Harvard 1940–1941: Tarski, Carnap and Quine on a Finitistic Language of Mathematics for Science. History and Philosophy of Logic, 26(4), 327–357.

Mancosu, P. (2009). Tarski’s Engagement with Philosophy. In: s. Lapointe, J. Wolenski, M. Marion, W. Miskiewicz (Eds.), The Golden Age of Polish Philosophy: Kazimierz Twardowski’s Philosophical Legacy (pp. 131–153). Dordrecht: Springer.

Prior, A. N. (1957). Logic Notes: Modal logic. Unpublished manuscript, Prior’s Nachalss in Bodleian Library Oxford, box 9.

Quine, W. V. O. (1947). The Problem of Interpreting Modal Logic. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12(2), 43–48.

Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Main Trends in Recent Philosophy: Two Dogmas of Empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60(1), 20–43.

Quine, W. V. O. (1966). Three Grades of Modal Involvement. In: W. V. O. Quine (Ed.), The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays (pp. 156–174). New York: Random House.

Quine, W. V. O. (1991). Two Dogmas in Retrospect. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 21(3), 265–274.

Tarski, A. (1987). A Philosophical Letter of Alfred Tarski. The Journal of Philosophy, 84(1), 28–32.

Tuboly, Á. T. (2015). Quine and Quantified Modal Logic: Against the Received View. Organon F, 22(4), 518–545.

Verhaegh, S. (2018). Sign and Object: Quine’s Forgotten Book Project. Synthese. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1693-z

Woleński, J. (1989). Logic and Philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw School. Dordrecht: Kluwer.